>>512138288
>I mean kikelensky and VP Harris both made public claims of acquiring nuclear deterrents in 2021, do you think that had nothing to do with russia deciding to invade?
Even if this claim of yours weren't a misrepresentation - the desire for a deterrent is still fundamentally a reaction than an action
russia has always been the aggressor with respect to Ukraine and you are here now, yet again, carrying water for the russian narrative
> And do you think that NATO thought that creating a state in Serbia called kososvo
That was due to genocide going on there, in fact it would be pertinent and consistent to occupy israel in a similar way given their crimes against humanity
>would end up being the predicate to russia creating the states of lpr and dpr?
This is the exact reason russia tried so desperately to echo the crimes against humanity committed in dissolving Yugoslavia because then it would have been valid
The problem is as always though the reality that it was nothing but a power grab and there was never organic support for russian separatism and even if there was this doesn't justify invasions and wars because that's some 18th century feudalism shit.
You are carrying water again.
For finding russia generally a sad excuse you sure seem to go out of your way to twist and contort yourself past empiric reality of this conflict with a whole lot of non-sequitur and sloganeering.
