Radical Centrist Charlie kirk is supposed to be the right wing's George Floyd. And like George Floyd to the left, Kirk represents everything wrong with Right wing.
>fake
>perverse
>without moral compass
>promotes homosexuals
>shields his degeneracy in christian sloganeering
>invokes emotional reasoning
>pretends to be traditional
>undermines his own party
>works against his nation
>promotes jews
>promotes immigration

Kirk is meant to be like George Floyd. You're meant to want to do something, and have a fight or have the government create a new TSA. There is nothing inspiring about Kirk, and he didn't represent anything, any more than Megan Kelly does, but the jews are getting desparate.

The idea is that people are going to march or protest in the streets with posterboard signs scrawlled over with
>we love you charlie

But no one, save for paid protestors, are going to show up. These protests are going to be as authentic as Patriot Front.

Should someone Tap the Sign? This is the moral outrage part of the false flag, so you're supposed to stick up for Charlie, because he was your . . .
What was he? Was he our buddy? That't's supposed to be it as though he represented young men, instead of using shame tactics to shut them up when they refused to be gatekept about NOT supporting israel, or NOT accepting faggots.
If they do go the route of mass unrest, the 'riots' and 'demonstrations' will be difficult to sustain when no one can think of a single thing the man did that mattered.

He didn't accomplish anything meaningful, aside from normalizing trannies at Trump rallies.

That was my bet on the killer, btw, is that Lady MAGA did it. >Charlie promised to run away with him Dog Day Afternoon style
>backed out
>leaves Lady M at the airport terminal
>lady M stands weeping while wearing women's underwear
>2 tickets to fire island go to waste
>lady MAGA goes ballistic

Bottom line: i'm not fighting a civil war to avenge the memory of a zionist faggot promoter

>>515643084
People are calling it “ghoulish” to celebrate Kirk’s death, and I suppose celebrating anyone’s death could be considered “ghoulish.” But getting assassinated doesn’t somehow make you a good person, regardless of what you did in life. We’re all of course against political violence for some reason no one has really explained and have to keep saying that, so of course I too must say “I am so against political violence for some reason,” but America is better off without Charlie Kirk. And he is going to be really, really hard to replace. Again, I cannot think of any non-Jew under the age of fifty who is willing to go around talking about “Israel is our greatest ally, they’re fighting Hamas over there so we don’t have to fight a Hamas invasion of America, there aren’t any war crimes, the food blockades are a hoax, no one is starving, most moral army.” He was on the level of Sean Hannity. You don’t see anyone else doing that.

But no, I don’t feel sad Charlie Kirk died, and I’m not going to post some social signally thing about “oh woe is me, political violence, oh the horror, can’t we just vote for change???”