>>514908006
You didn't read my posts and reacted too fast. I already addressed how this was replaced with British Israelism in my first post on the matter. William Blake wrote a counter poem about how Jesus walked the shores of Britain to counter Brutus directly. It is a national rewriting of heritage. When Greeks came, they recognised Druids and Celts as cousin. This is what the heraldry of European monarchs attests to.
It is not just the king, but if you research this topic, it was WIDELY accepted as true until the revolution of orange. Now the king is a descendant of king david and not Aeneas.
There is a lot of nuance in what you are saying. First of all the cultural exchange was not one-sided. It was mutual. Secondly, all kings claimed descent from Aeneas, not just in the UK but across Europe, which is how a HRE king came to power here and we had an 'augustan period'.
However, SOME of them claimed descent by intermarrying Aeneas and King David.
What you are talking about was pushed by freemasons of the orange order.
Ill post another book that shows the fusion of Roman heritage with King David heritage.
FUSION implies they are DISTINCT. You can't fuse two things unless you have two distinct things.
It was the capture of Graeco-Roman heritage by Judaising myth.