>>519086241
>The frog is the symbol of resistance.

Lucky guy who was down on his luck as a frog costume salesman becomes over night millionaire

ETA Until pedo-flag prison rape!?!?

>>518776570
>lmfao
>trump really does move mountains

Trump invited netanyahu where he is uninvited...


Trump is really fucking dumb.

He thinks netanyahu is his friend.

Like Trump believes he isn't an axe murderer and a pedophile and invited netanyahu where he isn't welcome, typical dumb Trump shit...

Trump would believe netanyahu is Santa clause if Fox News ran a story about it

>>518603551
>Nick Fuentes has repeatedly drawn attention for behavior that, while controversial, raises questions about potential criminal activity. One area of concern involves the organization or promotion of events that may violate local or federal laws. When large gatherings are encouraged without proper permits, or when rhetoric at such events borders on incitement, legal consequences could follow. The line between free speech and illegal incitement is thin, and Fuentes’ history of provocative commentary makes this a relevant point of scrutiny.
>
>Another potential area of criminal exposure involves online activity. Targeted harassment, threats, or intimidation through social media or other online platforms can meet the legal definitions of cybercrime in many jurisdictions. If communications are intended to intimidate, coerce, or harm individuals, even indirectly, they could trigger investigations under federal or state law.
>
>Financial conduct is also a critical concern. Public figures who solicit funds—whether for political purposes, campaigns, or organizations—must adhere to strict regulations regarding transparency and lawful use. Any misrepresentation or misuse of donations could constitute violations of campaign finance or charitable giving laws, leading to criminal liability.
>
>Furthermore, coordinating actions that encourage trespassing, harassment, or violence against individuals, organizations, or institutions can have legal repercussions. Even if participants are technically “volunteers,” leadership that directs or inspires illegal activity could face liability. Similarly, the dissemination of false statements or misrepresentations for financial, political, or social gain could trigger investigations into fraud or other offenses.
>
>In short, while controversy alone does not equal criminality, the combination of provocative public statements, organized activities, and online behavior creates a pattern of potential legal exposure.

If true