JPMorgan continued to supply Jeffrey Epstein and all his contacts with discrete financial services so that they may continue to purchase child sex slaves. Joe Biden attempted to cover this up.
Look at the date on this email, (>>514775896 in Picrel ) this is years after JPMORGAN officially claims they cut off all contact with Jeffrey Epstein.
>Kathy Ruemmler, who served under Presidents Clinton and Obama before joining white-collar defense firms, was one such referral. As The Daily Beast reported, Ruemmler showed up to Epstein’s New York arraignment and her name was found multiple times in Epstein’s 2014 schedule for meetings with Ehud Barak, Peter Thiel, and Bill Gates.
>But the unredacted filings reveal that Dimon and Epstein served on the same internal working group related to Highbridge Capital Management, the investment fund of Epstein’s close friend Glenn Dubin. JPMorgan acquired Highbridge in 2004, and the fund paid an Epstein company $15 million for “merger and acquisition advice.”
4chan Search
7 results for "ce6b6bfb81582a8d278312c069ebf85e"
Connection to Sex Trafficking and Blackmail:
The docket provided from Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Case No. 1:22-cv-10904, S.D.N.Y.) documents a high-profile civil lawsuit where the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) accused JPMorgan Chase of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation through negligent banking practices.
1. Direct Link to Sex Trafficking: Allegations and Evidence in the Case
• Core Allegations Against JPMorgan: The USVI lawsuit claims JPMorgan “knowingly, negligently, and unlawfully” provided banking services to Epstein from 1998 to 2019, despite his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The complaint asserts that human trafficking “was the principal business of the accounts Epstein maintained at JPMorgan,” with the bank handling suspicious transactions like large cash withdrawals (often $40,000–$80,000 monthly) used to pay victims and recruiters. These funds allegedly supported Epstein’s trafficking network on his private islands in the USVI (Little St. James and Great St. James), where he lured and abused dozens of girls and women.
The docket provided from Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Case No. 1:22-cv-10904, S.D.N.Y.) documents a high-profile civil lawsuit where the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) accused JPMorgan Chase of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation through negligent banking practices.
1. Direct Link to Sex Trafficking: Allegations and Evidence in the Case
• Core Allegations Against JPMorgan: The USVI lawsuit claims JPMorgan “knowingly, negligently, and unlawfully” provided banking services to Epstein from 1998 to 2019, despite his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The complaint asserts that human trafficking “was the principal business of the accounts Epstein maintained at JPMorgan,” with the bank handling suspicious transactions like large cash withdrawals (often $40,000–$80,000 monthly) used to pay victims and recruiters. These funds allegedly supported Epstein’s trafficking network on his private islands in the USVI (Little St. James and Great St. James), where he lured and abused dozens of girls and women.
• Proof from the Docket: Entries show extensive discovery battles over financial records, depositions, and documents from Epstein’s estate (e.g., Docket Nos. 154, 162, 217–245). For instance:
• Motions for summary judgment (Nos. 217, 222) include declarations with hundreds of exhibits (many redacted or sealed) detailing wire transfers, payments to “girls or women,” and bank statements (e.g., Exhibit 204 in No. 242, a 2014 Epstein bank statement). These exhibits reference “cash payments” and “financial benefits from Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein-related entities, or Epstein-related individuals” (No. 158).
• Depositions of key figures like JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon (mentioned in related media) and witnesses like Mary Erdoes and William Langford (Nos. 187, 158) probe the bank’s knowledge of Epstein’s activities. A minute entry (May 12, 2023) grants USVI permission to interrogate JPMorgan on revenue from Epstein, implying trafficking-generated funds.
• The docket’s volume of sealed/redacted materials (e.g., Nos. 15, 142, 147, 154–160) suggests sensitive evidence, such as victim payments or internal bank memos ignoring “red flags” like Epstein’s sex-offender status.
• Motions for summary judgment (Nos. 217, 222) include declarations with hundreds of exhibits (many redacted or sealed) detailing wire transfers, payments to “girls or women,” and bank statements (e.g., Exhibit 204 in No. 242, a 2014 Epstein bank statement). These exhibits reference “cash payments” and “financial benefits from Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein-related entities, or Epstein-related individuals” (No. 158).
• Depositions of key figures like JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon (mentioned in related media) and witnesses like Mary Erdoes and William Langford (Nos. 187, 158) probe the bank’s knowledge of Epstein’s activities. A minute entry (May 12, 2023) grants USVI permission to interrogate JPMorgan on revenue from Epstein, implying trafficking-generated funds.
• The docket’s volume of sealed/redacted materials (e.g., Nos. 15, 142, 147, 154–160) suggests sensitive evidence, such as victim payments or internal bank memos ignoring “red flags” like Epstein’s sex-offender status.
I want to build on this:
Connection to Sex Trafficking and Blackmail
The docket you provided from Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Case No. 1:22-cv-10904, S.D.N.Y.) documents a high-profile civil lawsuit where the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) accused JPMorgan Chase of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation through negligent banking practices.
1. Direct Link to Sex Trafficking: Allegations and Evidence in the Case
• Core Allegations Against JPMorgan: The USVI lawsuit claims JPMorgan “knowingly, negligently, and unlawfully” provided banking services to Epstein from 1998 to 2019, despite his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The complaint asserts that human trafficking “was the principal business of the accounts Epstein maintained at JPMorgan,” with the bank handling suspicious transactions like large cash withdrawals (often $40,000–$80,000 monthly) used to pay victims and recruiters. These funds allegedly supported Epstein’s trafficking network on his private islands in the USVI (Little St. James and Great St. James), where he lured and abused dozens of girls and women.
Connection to Sex Trafficking and Blackmail
The docket you provided from Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Case No. 1:22-cv-10904, S.D.N.Y.) documents a high-profile civil lawsuit where the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) accused JPMorgan Chase of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation through negligent banking practices.
1. Direct Link to Sex Trafficking: Allegations and Evidence in the Case
• Core Allegations Against JPMorgan: The USVI lawsuit claims JPMorgan “knowingly, negligently, and unlawfully” provided banking services to Epstein from 1998 to 2019, despite his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The complaint asserts that human trafficking “was the principal business of the accounts Epstein maintained at JPMorgan,” with the bank handling suspicious transactions like large cash withdrawals (often $40,000–$80,000 monthly) used to pay victims and recruiters. These funds allegedly supported Epstein’s trafficking network on his private islands in the USVI (Little St. James and Great St. James), where he lured and abused dozens of girls and women.
>>514744390
Anon has a good point about the money trail. Let’s see what anons have found from previous threads.
Anon has a good point about the money trail. Let’s see what anons have found from previous threads.
Big Beautiful Bill > Epstein Files > FED Transparency for the house.
>>513876552
Pic related, why is Cecile De Jongh not being investigated?
Pic related, why is Cecile De Jongh not being investigated?