>>23468113
You misread my tone, dumb gyppo, I'm saying we're not a threat in the slightest. I'm pretty sure we're still in a state of affairs that we have no anti-tank weaponry, because the last set of globalist whores literally gave our entire arsenal away to Ukraine, when they couldn't even use half of it, and thus wasted it. Russia sent like 2-3 destroyers up the British channel and we had nothing to deal with them with, media just censored it instead to maintain order. The RAF / airforce got hit my maximum diversity quotas (literal quote "I don't want to see any more useless fucking white men") which led our instructors to work for the Chinese (and they still are), while the UK has imported soldiers from the Indian airforce to train up whoever's dumb enough to sign up. And that's before both natives and forrins being adamant that nobody is going to die for this administration.
Considering my first point still stands, and that I'm pretty sure they were banking on NATO lending them anti-tank shit if we needed it, I'm 50/50 certain that all the US would need to do is land a single tank in Great Britain and we'd have no answer to it. You really, vastly underestimate how ridiculously easy it would be to take the country. The only reason I imagine we're being left alone right now is because the current admin are doing more short & long term damage to the country than any of our enemies ever could in the same time, and acquiescing to every demand anyone makes of them.
Romania unironically probably has a stronger national defence than the UK right now. Our cunts can't even sink overcapacity rubber dinghies filled with Somalis

>America was built on giving (You)r state the finger
Don't get ahead of yourself, it was built because puritans were really fucking annoying so we sent them to sail away (presumably and preferably off the known face of the Earth). Had enough of the ministry of truth rewriting our history to demonise us as is, don't need to bother yourself further.