>>519820790
Women's liberation did not mean liberation from any form of oppression becuase western women weren't oppressed by any means but liberation of women of their role and duties as women in society. Essentially they were liberated from any form of expectations, stigmas, femininity in society so all that's left is a self-centered destructive force that goes as far to tear down the society that looks after them while playing a victim at the same time.

Just look at it this way it is women's responsibility to mate with men to usher in the next generation and they don't even do that anymore unless the man is a rich chad so basically 1% of all men. This is something they've been "liberated" from doing which for obvious reasons is sustainable at all. The average man wants to start families but women don't at least not with the average man.

>>515007799
>Staying at home to raise children and care for the family = slavery/wasting her potential
>Working for a business that doesn't really care about you and views you as an easily replaceable cog = Freedom/making the most of her potential

She wanted this though. She wanted to live like a man having a career because being at home to take care of the family was cruel and just men enslaving women. She should have multiple children at home making memorable memories with too but instead she probably only has one child and is missing out on the memorable moments as well. You go girl boss slay queen.

>>510318866
I thought women went their own way and didn't need men anymore?