A "conservative" in today would be considered a radical in the 60s. The left has basically reached rock bottom with absurdities like pregnant men et cetera.. and the overton window can't shift any further, so it seems like the right is winning, but really we are in so deep it doesn't really matter.
Malaysia now has below replacement birth rates, for example, a sign that women have stopped caring about raising families. Degeneracy is increasing despite what some random populist gets up to. They are not going to fundamentally change society, it would realistically take a few generations with groups like Mormons figuring out how to maintain their community amidst the modern world and all its dopamine slop without ending up an insular cult which is simply degeneracy in another form.
>Are there books on how one can navigate through a period like this with without a doubt great change?
There are very few modern writers who address to core problem of degeneracy. The most current would be The Rebel by Albert Camus which was like in 1950 or some shit. The rest would be from classical antiquity like the works of Sophocles, tales like the Aeneid or "fascist" like Ride the Tiger.
4chan Search
2 results for "cfddf095fd043c7bc31ae4b9c06a30f6"
>>510151806
Libertarianism would solve most of these problems, at least the libertarianism of Ron Paul's heyday.
You could live in an all white neighborhood, if you must, but you have to pay for it, because why should someone's taxpayers go to support something so arbitrary? Likewise your tax dollars won't go to supporting bussing black kids to white schools and other nonsense. Illegal immigration is in large part motivated by our social welfare system which allows them to bring their dependents.
Libertarianism can't achieve the aryan utopia /pol/ imagines, but the world has changed so much frankly it is no longer feasible. I am not sure if it is even desirable. Do you want humanity to be like that, just up and wiping out entire sections of the population, I am not particularly shocked, but I am not an edgelord either, there is a certain religious pollution to this.
Libertarianism would solve most of these problems, at least the libertarianism of Ron Paul's heyday.
You could live in an all white neighborhood, if you must, but you have to pay for it, because why should someone's taxpayers go to support something so arbitrary? Likewise your tax dollars won't go to supporting bussing black kids to white schools and other nonsense. Illegal immigration is in large part motivated by our social welfare system which allows them to bring their dependents.
Libertarianism can't achieve the aryan utopia /pol/ imagines, but the world has changed so much frankly it is no longer feasible. I am not sure if it is even desirable. Do you want humanity to be like that, just up and wiping out entire sections of the population, I am not particularly shocked, but I am not an edgelord either, there is a certain religious pollution to this.