>>512642030
Why insist on keeping money around? Banks as well? And also the economy operated for financial profit? Do you actually want to change anything?
You know what banks do?
The purpose of banks is to enable the geometric growth of the money supply by creating fictional yet spendable legal tender. That's all.
So banks produce inflation by lending new money into existence (and circulation as well because no one borrows money not to spend it). Why? So there's money for business and corporate profits, which there otherwise wouldn't be. Why? So that the for-financial-profit operated economic model of capitalism is preserved?
Without banks creating fictional yet spendable legal tender, there would not be geometric growth of the supply of legal tender.
Without geometric growth of the supply of legal tender there is no capitalism because generalised financial profit is mathematically impossible.
So ask yourself: why do you actually want to keep money around? What's the goal? What role does it fulfil that you think you need to keep it around.
Maybe you think you need it around and want to keep it around because it's all you've known and you have trouble imagining how you'd cope with adjusting to something else or how something else would work.
Yeah, most people won't want to give it up because money lets you consume products from the best producers in the world, even if they are on the other side of the globe. Without money, everyone's own country would need to produce computer graphics processing units if they wanted GPUs. And they'd suck at first and maybe never be quite as good as the world best. This is why people think this system is good: they'd not be able to produce 4090s domestically and would have to settle for domestically produced Radeon 390s (for a while) but under globalist capitalism they get to buy from the one 4090 producer in the world. So people like globalist capitalism because they suck and wouldn't be able to compete with the world best.