>>17928551
>Trinitarianism" mean more broadly the notion that God has hypostases.
No, to be a trinitarian is to believe in one God and yet at the same time three persons that share a divine nature. Nothing else would do. You claimed the trinity itself was necessary but then retracted by saying any -nity is necessary. Which means you have conceded your original claim, which is what I am saying
>the thing most beyond us in all of existence
Yes but what we know of him from scripture reveals his existence to us.
>You can't have great power and be powerless.
Yes you can if you are given that power, it means you have no inherent power but God's will is channeled through you to perform miracles. The Father has no need to get his energy from anywhere else, Jesus does
>historical basis
You don't want to go there. Very few things about your narrative is historical. I already quoted scripture "By myself I can do nothing"
>so it's logically impossible for anything to be better than him
Exactly, so see you too have non arbitrary limits in your idea of omnipotence.
>Then I can do something your unitarian god can't
Yes, it's not logically possible for God to be sent to hell and make Satan greater than him the same way it isn't for him to depend on sustenance or anything else. God not being able to do the impossible is not a limit to this ability to do all things, married bachelors are not things.