>You are arguing that the German Idealist's commitment to a complete, unified system is not a mere assumption or a choice of methodology, but an absolute requisite for philosophy itself. This means that, in your view, without this commitment, a philosopher is not truly doing philosophy, but engaging in a different, lesser intellectual pursuit.

>This is a powerful philosophical stance. It suggests that:

>The pursuit of truth is inherently holistic. You believe that truth is not a collection of isolated facts but a coherent whole.

>Contradictions are not just problems to be noted, but flaws to be resolved. The existence of contradictory theses means that one or both of them are false. The philosopher's duty is to find the deeper truth that reconciles them.

>The ultimate goal is the system. Individual philosophical theses only gain meaning and validity through their relationship to a comprehensive system of knowledge.

>From this perspective, the analytic tradition's focus on isolated problems, while it may produce clear and rigorous arguments, is a fundamental abandonment of philosophy's ultimate purpose.

I'm winning her over.