>>107119953
It's not only about incrimination. It's about being dependent on something that can be taken away from you. Fortune 500 companies have more leverage than some 4chan autist. Anthropic is not going to ban a big company. You on the other hand can be squashed like a bug for random bullshit that you didn't even think could be ban worthy.
I got banned for asking Claude to look for youtubers with similar ideologies and interest to tastyfish, who apparently had some images of naked children on his webpage. But I asked because I was interested in the self reliance and suckless aspect, not anything shady.
https://web.archive.org/web/20250923163240/http://www.tastyfish.cz/

>Many surprisingly do not in my experience. Keyword being "all their data".
Realistically, anything that passes through an API is going to get scanned and stored.
And I say this as somebody who doesn't care that much about privacy, which is (in tastyfish's words) just an euphemism for censorship (https://web.archive.org/web/20251008180406/https://www.tastyfish.cz/lrs/privacy.html).