Connection to Sex Trafficking and Blackmail
The docket you provided from Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Case No. 1:22-cv-10904, S.D.N.Y.) documents a high-profile civil lawsuit where the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) accused JPMorgan Chase of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation through negligent banking practices.

1. Direct Link to Sex Trafficking: Allegations and Evidence in the Case
• Core Allegations Against JPMorgan: The USVI lawsuit claims JPMorgan “knowingly, negligently, and unlawfully” provided banking services to Epstein from 1998 to 2019, despite his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The complaint asserts that human trafficking “was the principal business of the accounts Epstein maintained at JPMorgan,” with the bank handling suspicious transactions like large cash withdrawals (often $40,000–$80,000 monthly) used to pay victims and recruiters. These funds allegedly supported Epstein’s trafficking network on his private islands in the USVI (Little St. James and Great St. James), where he lured and abused dozens of girls and women.

>>514710505

Morning hour debate…
Heavily sealed redacted page shows the people who convinced JPM (check highlight) to keep epstein as a client, further down it says JPM was afraid Epstein was involved in human trafficking and it would reflect poorly on the firm.

>After internal discussions with Jes Staley,
Mary Erdoes, Catherine Keating, John Duffy
and Mary Casey, it was decided that we will
keep Mr. Epstein solely as a banking client
and on a 'reactive', client service basis. We
will not proactively solicit new investment
business from him

Keep in mind this was after his 08 trial.

>>514630322

Connection to Sex Trafficking and Blackmail
The docket you provided from Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Case No. 1:22-cv-10904, S.D.N.Y.) documents a high-profile civil lawsuit where the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI) accused JPMorgan Chase of enabling Jeffrey Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation through negligent banking practices.

1. Direct Link to Sex Trafficking: Allegations and Evidence in the Case
• Core Allegations Against JPMorgan: The USVI lawsuit claims JPMorgan “knowingly, negligently, and unlawfully” provided banking services to Epstein from 1998 to 2019, despite his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The complaint asserts that human trafficking “was the principal business of the accounts Epstein maintained at JPMorgan,” with the bank handling suspicious transactions like large cash withdrawals (often $40,000–$80,000 monthly) used to pay victims and recruiters. These funds allegedly supported Epstein’s trafficking network on his private islands in the USVI (Little St. James and Great St. James), where he lured and abused dozens of girls and women.

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Deutsche-Bank-aktiengesellschaft-class-action-complaint.pdf

Direct Link to Sex Trafficking: Allegations and Evidence in the Case
• Core Allegations Against JPMorgan: The USVI lawsuit claims JPMorgan “knowingly, negligently, and unlawfully” provided banking services to Epstein from 1998 to 2019, despite his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor for prostitution. The complaint asserts that human trafficking “was the principal business of the accounts Epstein maintained at JPMorgan,” with the bank handling suspicious transactions like large cash withdrawals (often $40,000–$80,000 monthly) used to pay victims and recruiters. These funds allegedly supported Epstein’s trafficking network on his private islands in the USVI (Little St. James and Great St. James), where he lured and abused dozens of girls and women.

Picrel
Heavily sealed redacted page shows the people who convinced JPM (check highlight) to keep epstein as a client, further down it says JPM was afraid Epstein was involved in human trafficking and it would reflect poorly on the firm.

>After internal discussions with Jes Staley,
Mary Erdoes, Catherine Keating, John Duffy
and Mary Casey, it was decided that we will
keep Mr. Epstein solely as a banking client
and on a 'reactive', client service basis. We
will not proactively solicit new investment
business from him

Keep in mind this was after his 08 trial.

Heavily sealed redacted page shows the people who convinced JPM (check highlight) to keep epstein as a client, further down it says JPM was afraid Epstein was involved in human trafficking and it would reflect poorly on the firm.

>After internal discussions with Jes Staley,
Mary Erdoes, Catherine Keating, John Duffy
and Mary Casey, it was decided that we will
keep Mr. Epstein solely as a banking client
and on a 'reactive', client service basis. We
will not proactively solicit new investment
business from him

Keep in mind this was after his 08 trial.

Heavily sealed redacted page shows the people who convinced JPM (check highlight) to keep epstein as a client, further down it says JPM was afraid Epstein was involved in human trafficking and it would reflect poorly on the firm.

>After internal discussions with Jes Staley,
Mary Erdoes, Catherine Keating, John Duffy
and Mary Casey, it was decided that we will
keep Mr. Epstein solely as a banking client
and on a 'reactive', client service basis. We
will not proactively solicit new investment
business from him

Keep in mind this was after his 08 trial.

bump

Heavily sealed redacted page shows the people who convinced JPM (check highlight) to keep epstein as a client, further down it says JPM was afraid Epstein was involved in human trafficking and it would reflect poorly on the firm.

>After internal discussions with Jes Staley,
Mary Erdoes, Catherine Keating, John Duffy
and Mary Casey, it was decided that we will
keep Mr. Epstein solely as a banking client
and on a 'reactive', client service basis. We
will not proactively solicit new investment
business from him

Keep in mind this was after his 08 trial.

Heavily sealed redacted page shows the people who convinced JPM (check highlight) to keep epstein as a client, further down it says JPM was afraid Epstein was involved in human trafficking and it would reflect poorly on the firm.

>After internal discussions with Jes Staley,
Mary Erdoes, Catherine Keating, John Duffy
and Mary Casey, it was decided that we will
keep Mr. Epstein solely as a banking client
and on a 'reactive', client service basis. We
will not proactively solicit new investment
business from him

Keep in mind this was after his 08 trial.