>>511266389
You're trying to play semantics with something clear as day, and doing nothing but make the MIGA position look worse. You have a passage of a book about what Trump told him about Epstein, and their relationship, followed by him stating that they'd been closer than he was made to believe. Literally "depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is"-tier.
>There's no proof Trump was ever around Epstein when Epstein had any underage girls around him, nor that Epstein had underage girls around him when he was hanging out with Trump.
The MIGA implication of the Bradley Edwards quote you posted is that Trump had exposed him as a pedophile, but he did nothing of the sort.
You're a bad faith kike, and you're still running from Edwards confirming that the birthday album exists.