>>9529
>The intent or actions of the vtuber does not matter
>A vtuber saying/showing something shouldn't give you a free out of jail card for you to bring it up 50 years later
These two statements are in direct contradiction.
This is basically what you are saying:

Vtuber action 1: talk about their height in a stream -> it's ok to talk about their height on /vt/
Vtuber (in)action 2: do not talk about their height the next day -> it's no longer ok to talk about their height on /vt/
Vtuber action 3: talk about their height in a stream the following day -> it's once again ok to talk about their height on /vt/

Substitute a day for a month or a year, it doesn't really matter. Either way you are shifting what is allowed based on what the vtuber has said/done recently, and I don't think timegating discussion makes any sense.

>>9530
>people shouldn't discuss vtuber's IRL appearances since that's what's written in the rules
No, that's not what's written in the rules. The rules disallow "IRL" content without expanding on what that means (does it mean appearance? voice? height? age? ethnicity? accent?).
There are tons of streamers who make recurring jokes in their community about how short/flat chested/etc. they are and discussion on those things has NEVER been an issue, even though that is very much about a vtuber's IRL appearance. Anons will also make comments during handcam streams about how cute and small someone's hands are which don't seem to trip any alarms either.