>>520310188
It sounds like Walmart should have paid for a No Kangs protest instead of a No Kings protest.

>>519677079
Walmart needs slaves

>>519473261
They thought they would riot and attack people, that's how they "convince" city people to vote for democrats when they don't want to. Basically, "vote democrat or these psycho antifa will keep attacking you." Trump sent national guard to all these troublesome cities though, so it put a lid on their plans for now. But they already paid to organize these protests months in advance, so they went ahead with them anyways.

>>519472988
Oh no, the 7 gorrillion paid protestors didn't do anything! How do we enshitify America now fellow leftards?

>>519308016
They beat up a 60 year old guy so Walmart could make more money

>>519248129
>was there some news relating to the no kings thing that prompted all these threads today?
Not really, they just had another little cryfest about billionaires losing their slaves today. It's nothing to concern yourself with.

>>519233931
Yeah, Walmart isn't paying them to loot Walmarts

>>519231346
>if there was actual paid protests there would have been evidence.
There is evidence, shill