>>106479481
That one's great.
>>106479411
lol
>>106479632
You going to complete the transformation?
>>106475778
>not exactly uncensored if it still needs a jailbreak
I don't consider Dipsy's JB in a true sense of "I'm tricking the LLM into a response" and more as "it's appropriate for the LLM to return lewd responses in this case."
Use case for DS includes lot of legit, corporate activities where NSFW responses are not OK. The model needs to be able to be prompted on SFW and NSFW levels of response. Which DS needs.
This, vs. prefill and other backflips anons are doing with Anthropic / Gemini modesl, or getting warning letters from OAI on paid API in any case of NSFW usage.