>>64410033
I'm one of the anons you replied to
It's just that OP's statement is surprising to me, since I've seen conflicting news on the subject
I hope I'm wrong and OP is right, it's just that I'd like to be sure. Also, having a source would be useful if I ever have the displeasure of meeting a gloating vatnik myself
Speaking of which, shills around here are way less subtle than the anons you replied to