>>539657084
The events that play out and the literal written dialogue is the objective I am dealing with.
Your opinions and personal interpretations you are using as arguments are subjective.
Give me an actual argument or something to work with that isn't "I felt different, so suddenly the dialogue was actually something different than it in print."
I'm not even using Appeal to Popularity or anything to base this either, it seems like a pretty common sentiment that people disliked Wuk Lamat so you're just a retard in all honesty.