>>17933223
because thats probably not even Amida or Amitabha but another God. Amitābha is usually just depicted as a Buddha with a swastika on his chest; he is considered in some sects to be the primordial Buddha, as in the first Buddha in the ages before Siddhartha.

the european artist who depicted the OP image likely confused Amitābha for another god, possibly Avaloketeshvara or Vajrakilaya, since those gods are depicted with multiple arms and heads