>>18082908
>Bullshit
...Friend, I understand that you have relatively little linguistic knowledge, There's nothing wrong with that, but when it becomes stubbornness, it's a whole other story. I tried to be polite in this thread and received lame responses. The development of Indo-Aryan phonetics was not marginally influenced by a language with a similar phonetic structure to Tamil. there is no denying it at this point.
Retroflexion is a striking feature of Dravidian languages and was absent in Indo-Iranian, and this same retroflexion began to be absent in RV, but we already have some evidence of it appearing in the Rigveda and it became more common in the Prakrit period, for example. The loss of the r or rs sound is the main cause of retroflexion, as seen in the change from dușta to duṭṭha and varṇa to vaṇṇa.
and we also have the loss of voiced sibilants from "Proto-Aryan" that occurred after the phonemicization of retroflexion. see forms like "nīda" and "anat" and the name of the rșis family Kanvas with the phoneme "ṇ" that show a clear Dravidian influence.
Sources:https://www.scribd.com/document/758977208/The-influence-of-Dravidian-on-Indo-Aryan

Regarding your other posts, I don't know if I understood exactly what the histography of Indian kings would serve for the question of whether or not the term Aryan is exclusive to PIIr, honestly. But we already had a thread here before, the reconstructed word for PIE or LPIE would be h2eryós, and we have cognates in several branches, including probably Tocharian. and even in the Iberian languages, speaking of which, I think I found something new.