>>214882057
>>214884073
Angels are whatever the people that believes in them decides to depict them as, which will mostly reflect the form in which they have decided to appear to them. Your depiction is just as valid as theirs. Unless you have had experiences with them that are somehow more 'true' than those others have had? Their actual nature escapes your understanding, anyhow, so it is pointless to argue about what they 'look like'. Keep that in mind...

>>95995029
God forbids sodomy too so he’ll have to look elsewhere