>>11561927
>The fact that it was one of the lead ins to the GREAT Depression kind of nullifies that.
LMAO. Holy shit. You're straight up making shit up now, because you're a retard who's never read history and repeats bullshit

The US had over 10 years of RAPID economic GROWTH under that act and it was REPLACED by another act because it was TOO GOOD: it made companies so rich they could become giant monopolies.
And since the government was still for the people back then and recognized that bad shit was happening, the government started breaking up these monopolies.
You'd be defending and arguing for monopolies if this was the early 1900s because >what about progress! breaking up monopolies is a command economy!

>you actually looked into automated production for once!
I've always known, hence explaining it and making a point. You missed the point, because despite shit becoming worse because of automation, people kept buying the worse shit.
Retards like you don't care about consequences and that's why we're left with no alternatives. You're told that automation makes things cheaper for us, but how come prices never go down? Again, I've pointed out that prices actually went UP since the companies needed to pay off the short term costs of creating factories overseas and the only thing that actually became cheaper were just COSTS. The consumer never saw any real benefits from this.

Company's profit margins was the only benefit and this is what you've been defending this entire thread. You don't care about the worker, you're just afraid of the company's profit margin will decrease and how that'll affect you're able to afford with your retard bucks the government sends you.

Also, way to ignore how California's minimum wage laws made everything more expensive for Californians. How much cheaper is it in the midwest? A poorfag there has better buying power and housing options than someone in San Jose, San Diego, San Francisco, San Bernardino or San Whatever