>>18132377
>tested
Do you really expect that the afterlife can be controlled?

The fact that they failed doesn't disprove the others

>>18112092
You seem to be under the impression that the Early Church all agrees that images are banned and that Irenaeus represents the entirety of early Christianity.

They aren't, and he wasn't

All that matters is that the dogmas remain exactly the same
It becomes gnostic if they *added* pagan and heretical contents

>>18088911
USA put into power a dictator who started the Haitian massacre. They are still recovering from it

I am not saying that Haitians are innocent
I'm saying that it's not entirely their fault

>>18086733
This merely refers to Eunuchs, wtf

They were castrated because they will be entrusted with powerful roles, and the Royals don't want them creating heirs
Yes, they were employed in choirs, but so is personal attendants of the women of the court

The Church wasn't even a powerful position in 600AD. They were seen as merely subjects of the king and the authority of the bishops did not exist outside of their given city