>>18084396
It's literally what you are doing moron, even your greatest apologists agree this whole thing is bullshit. I still don't have an argument why your rejection is valid but ours isn't so it stands even from that perspective. Why would I even reject it when penis tasting is part of your religion?
>"A common test for foreskinned authenticity [in medieval times] was taste. A physician, supervised by a priest, sampled the skin for the flavor of genuine holiness. The taster was called a croque-prépuce, or ‘foreskin cruncher.’"[10]
There's nothing wrong with taking the flesh of another man in your mouth so why is it wrong to take his seed?