>>514873932
>The state is nothing other than advanced brigandry. A commonwealth of an oligarchic class who mutually agree to enforce their property claims on the poor.
yeah... it generally devolves to that, democratic or monarchal...

>As to your pic related, understand that the basis of the property right is the moral correctness of accumulated wealth if accumulated by moral transactions.
i wish for moral correctness to be a non-factor; i'd rather a system be constructed to deliberately optimize for anti-fragility, or at least long-term stability.

>Accumulated property must be collective, with social agreements, perhaps recorded precisely with law, perhaps with neutrality and voluntary transaction, market based mechanisms. The collective defense of the common property treats the accumulation as a set of both private holdings and common property and if one or the other is adulterated, the scheme of accumulated property collapses and is ripe for plunder by brigands.
so imo collectively own the value of the property, but allow for a functionally divorced use and allocation of it.

within corporations exist two concepts of ownership... could they not be appropriated toward socialistic/egalitarian ends?