>>18077988
>you try and obfuscate your way out of a statute that very obviously condemns the behavior you claim was widespread and accepted
No it doesn't, retard.
>The words and writings of philosophers, of a school of which I mentioned directly
Post these writings that supposedly prove that pederasty wasn't common or accepted or legal in ancient Greece.
>We have no idea what the lower classes thought of this behavior
Yes we do. Despite the fact that the lower classes did not leave much of a written record, we can infer that they accepted (and engaged in) pederasty for various reasons, such as:
1: The practice was widespread in general
2: Items depicting pederastic scenes were commonly owned by the lower/middle classes
3: They told stories about how their gods loved boys
4: They worshiped gods that loved boys
5: Various writers often mention how the practice was common throughout society (Plato lamented the fact that it would be impossible to outlaw because of how common it was)
6: They enjoyed plays which featured pederastic themes, or plays entirely centered around the theme of pederasty
7: They voted for and celebrated politicians who were pederasts and/or did not legally disapprove of pederasty (i.e. Solon)
8: There is no indication from any of the sources that the lower/middle classes were opposed to the practice
9: Elite opinion doesn't always diverge much from the lower classes; e.g. the upper classes in our society harshly disapprove of pedophilia, and this is representative of lower/middle class opinion as well
So really, you're just coping and trying to fit ancient Greek pederasty into your paranoid poltroon narrative of elites all being pedoz or something.
Also, this is the THIRD reply since posting "I don't really have a bone to pick with you, you have already made your position indefensible and talking to you is a waste of time". And you are now writing more speculative fanfiction about me. Keep barking for me like a deranged, obsessed, dog.