>>105303344
>unless you want to start arguing the different "value" of subs earned through memes, music, collabing, networking...)
I do to an extent
More so I think it's somewhat "cheating" to count what is ostensibly just a clip channel that gets giga-boosted by the shorts algo, while ENs have more traction on things like streams and video uploads but their constant output of that content causes their algo to mired because Youtube doesn't enjoy pushing those forms of content as hard
Like as >>105303466 said for reference for how insane the shorts algo can be, this short blew up and the result of it blowing up it made the EN channel gain about 30~k new subs in a month, literally tripled its growth lol