>>17927803
>What is "Malcolm himself"?
Everything that satisfies the definition of Malcolm, it depends if you want to take him as an object or whatever. For example here we can say specifically a conscious agent who can self reference because we are talking about objects who have a "himself" (a person). I wouldn't call my hair a person in that context but as a physical object it indeed is a part of me.
>Jesus is more akin to an attribute of God's
Attributes are not parts, they are properties of an object. For example a red circle has the properties of being red and also a circle. You cannot separate them by division of any kind to get an independent redness or circleness.
>That's like saying
Absolutely not, one is a question of how precise you are being with your location and the other is if you are referring to the whole or the part.
>John 1
This just depends on interpretation. Unitarians also believe in this verse, did you know? And now you are implying he wasn't just a meat suit but an actual separate person from the rest of the godhead. Can you be clear and tell me if Jesus is the flesh only or the spirit inhabiting flesh?
>And you know
I know what the text teaches, he was exactly like us. Do you believe God can suffer from temptation? If yes then you believe God lusts after beautiful women.
>There is one ruach for them all and there is no advantage of man over animal
Yes in the context it makes it clear this is talking more about our lifespan and destination from our perspective. Of course God knows that but we do not.
>Can you show me Paul rejecting Moses?
I can show you where he taught Jews to abandon the law and I already did that. He himself, a Pharisee Jewish man has done so. If that isn't a rejection of Moses then I don't know what is