>>513711893
You don't want your wife to get a scientifically confirmed life boost?
Not letting her to act out her natural desires is misogyny.

>>512187829
It seems that w*men aren't capable of conscious consent at any age - they should just ban sex with them altogether. These poor creatures don't have the cognitive capacity for self-awareness and long-term decisions, therefore they should be spared from activities such as mate selection or voting.

>>509309137
>On top of that they're autogynephilic
Very true, I imagine being a w*man is like having a steady dose of MDMA in your system. Euphoria, horniness, stupidity - 24/7. Dancing, crowds of strangers, facsination by colors and fluffy materials. Either MDMA or the cognition of a small, slightly retarded child.

>>508880403
>You can work on that mentally. Sublimate the sex drive and reason against it. Better than compromising.
Wise thinking, brother. Cultivate and deploy intellect to defeat the monkey coomer burden.
Recommended /lit/:
>Schopenhauer - Essays and Aphorisms
>Weininger - Sex and Character
>Esther Villar - The Manipulated Man

ISRAEL IS REAL ?

KANGZ & TAXCOLLECTORS

>>507086076
>The fundamental fault of the female character is that it has no sense of justice
Or
>Woman is sexually much more excitable (not sensitive) psysiologically than man
Or
>The condition of sexual excitement is the supreme moment of a woman's life
I can't see how you'd disprove any of those statements