>>60812751
>nigvidier will have to step up their game and go for graphene
Semiconductor manufacturing is heavily specialized towards silicon. To utilize graphene in semiconductors, the current requirement is to shift to a SiC substrate, not pure silicon. That is a very big ask for even the biggest semiconductors manufacturers. It's still in its research phases. The only publicly known instance of graphene on SiC is from Georgia Tech as a proof of concept, so it has no publicly known scalable process to make this possible.

Simply put, you're putting yourself way too far in the future, and it's totally irrelevant for short term gains. You're gambling not only on graphene, but semiconductors R&D that doesn't even exist yet. Graphene is a technology for a 2-3nm process node. That doesn't exist today.

>better moon missions
The semiconductor of choice is GaN for aerospace and space applications. It is inherently radiation hardened to a certain degree. Right now, your US-listed GaN semiconductors stocks are:
>Navitas Semiconductor (NVTS)
>Wolfspeed, Inc. (WOLF)

I recommend that you do some research on graphene and how it applies to next-gen technologies. Your mind is fixated on what is very evidently media and influencer hype, and graphene has a reputation for attracting frauds and grifters because it's so poorly understood. I'd say there's fewer than five companies worth evaluating as an estimate and even then I feel like I'm being generous in that assessment.

>>60812838
>currently only hydrograph can produce the best in class graphene
That's their own claim, and graphene is not that hard to make. Even Sorensen, who developed the process, said that graphene can be made by accident from lighting acetylene on fire.

It also doesn't matter if they can make the best graphene in the world until they can meet industrial demand, which they currently can't. That's why the promises to domicile and operate in Texas is important. No strong indicators exist beyond announcements.