>>725407694
the theory whose very author came out later debunking it, after new information?

>>725412095
going back to that anon's argument: "omega guys like the MC of that story don't deserve to get laid".
But "cute guys" like the MC of that story get fawned over all the time, at least in Japan where the author of that NTR is from.
That story is the author's fantasy and doesn't correspond with empirical evidence.