>>514007427
No, and it requires a minimal effort investment on the part of the individual, doubly so if there's a superficial spokesperson behind it, providing a figurehead for the ignorant to rally behind.

Since you've mentioned power, and the accrual of said power, three consecutive times now, paired with basic grammar and proper punctuation, financial market manipulation is absolutely ripe for abuse and is, I would argue, one of the most _easily accessible_ chinks in your "otherwise infallible" system, and most certainly warrants a roundtable discussion with your glowie mates, you fed fuck.

The only people obssessed with power for powers sake are women (as a collective), and those who already hold the proverbial power, because these two groups of people are the only ones dumb enough to reach down and grab it. Lovely speaking with you, mate.