>>514067536
>True
And??
The fuck does this have to do with anything??
No one considers the UK laws legitimate to begin; this is like saying a KGB officer shooting someone fleeing over the Berlin wall was legitimate because that was the law of the land.
Unless you think laws are inherently just appealing to the law is an appeal to authority (a formal logical fallacy) one again you yourself dont even adhere to if you agree with consistently if you agree to civil disobediance in any fashion.
>true
Again; and?
Se above.
>Heard that was the case
From Who??
>True
And Arabs dont?
>Common sense
Do you think all crimes can only be persecuted on video evidence?
How the hell do you think anyone was convicet of anything before cameras??
>True
Again:
A.
N.
D.
?
Unless you think every law every legislated by a state was moral and oughht to have been followed this says NOTHlNG
>A matter of opinion.
LOL