>>17870265
>Somatic cell nuclear transfer.
Wait a minute are you now saying Jesus is a clone of Mary? So he impregnated his own mother who is also his own sister to give birth to himself? How does he even have a Father at this point?
>since all christian denominations agree on the truine God
No they absolutely do not. What you've done here is claim they are no true Christians by presupposing your ideas about God just must be true a priori and no other interpretation would do.
>1. The Father cannot be begotten and the Father is God
Is that an essential property of the Father's nature or just the divine nature? If it's the first then the Father cannot be the same God as the Son because their natures are different. And if it is the second then the Son lacks an essential property of God and is thus not God. If it's neither then you are acknowledging that it's possible for there to be other beings with aseity beside God.
>2. The person (the Son) could be begotten since otherwise it would be illogical and beyond our reason, as nothing which implies a contradiction is a counter to omnipotence of God.
See the thing is he said God cannot be begotten, not just the Father. It's consistent with his other ideas such as saying there's another god that's subservient to the one true God.