>>520432533
I mentioned some things in different contexts that you are now mashing together
>But calling it Turkic is a strech.
the breakdown that I wrote was in terms of "looks"
>Romanian is Frenchified Vlachian.
>"Vlachian" does not exist on its own and is really just a mixture
at this rate the Bulgarians are Vlahs too, if you really want to go that way
the idea that right here there is a major gap between some "slavic Bulgarians" and some "original distinct population named Vlahs" is laughable
>the only thing that is French is the cultural implant that Romania received in order to become a country but they're absolutely nothing like the French, even civically as in person-to-person
>romanians are no tindividualists, they're a collectivist mob
>romanians care little about peace and follow migratory tendencies way more
>romanians are compliant and submissive, the French are not and would err on rebelious, especially against the government which a Romanian would never-ever do and would only hit down
>etc