>>4462793
do you think it's a big sharpness difference? i'm talking about the 35/1.4 nokton classic ii, to be clear. these are scanned via nikon 60mm micro on gfx plus valoi 360 film holder. i think both of those shots were around f2.8
>>4462777
of course. i simply enjoy machines that last a long time. i've also entertained the thought of getting an m4 or m6
>>4462837
you will never sway someone from leica m with a practicality argument. if it was about that, they wouldn't be considering the leica in the first place.