>>18112354
>You know you guys can disagree with pedoanon’s moral views without distorting history
But the fact that pederasty was prominent in many societies historically can tell us many things, such as:

1) male sexual attraction to boys is somewhat normative; a high proportion of men can enjoy such relationships when it is socially permissible
2) men who were considered respectable in their time had sexual relations with boys, and this was not viewed as a point of contention, or a sign of psychopathology
3) a universal detestation towards pederasty does not exist; the criminalization of homosexuality in Europe historically existed largely due to the influence of Judeo-Christianity
4) in these societies which practice pederasty, the psychological "trauma" supposedly caused by these relationships either doesn't exist, or it wasn't identified because it wasn't notable (the former is true)

And most of the butthurt responders know that this is all true, which is why they have to lie about historical facts. Also, their entire weltanschauung is often predicated on the idea that the ancients existed in a golden age where everyone was super heckin' redpilled and trad just like their favourite e-celebs with marble statue avis are, but that the (((degenerates))) in academia lie about it or something.

BOI