>>513243854
>47 per cent
>47
ha
anyway, just because people arent using those specific websites
doesnt mean they arent finding porn, and extremely easily
so, usage of specific websites is down, as people migrate to others
a very pointless exercise, porn is everywhere, VPNs exist too, free ones even
their statement about VPNs not being used, and/or just regular socks5 proxies, how did they even verify that?
>but what of the blacklist services, their apis to check if an ip is a "proxy", and deny access to the target site
only works until you find the abundance of IPs not on any 'ip blacklist lookup' service
how fucking stupid
probably an old boomers idea