>>96479446
>WAAAH!! HU-HU-WAAAAAAAAAHHHH!!!
Sorry little buddy, but you will never be a real jew. Though you imitate their cowardice and applied obtuseness in argument very well, you lack all their famous rhetorical skill.

Now a little more on the pre-christian cross: the swastika actually is even more widespread in European and non-European beliefs than many realize. It's not just popular in eastern religion into the modern day, but there are brick houses built on Navajo reservations in the 1930s that have swastikas displayed in the brick work. And long before that, the Navajo, Pueblo, and many other indigenous American people groups held the swastika as a powerful symbol of luck and life. It was painted on Roman shields during the days of the republic, and sewn into Lithuanian clothing a thousand years before christlings came north to genocide them.
The ANKH, on the other hand, is not actually a cross in it's conception. It was originally supposed to be a KNOT like the famous celtic knots. It is not a solar symbol, nor represents a celestial body at all. HOWEVER, it DOES represent eternal life, so it could in some conceptions repel a vampiric entity if one believes that a symbol of undying life would be the thing that repels a beast of unnatural animation.
A final honorable mention might be the Tyr/Tiwaz rune of the Nordic futharks. It's shape is close enough to a cross that if it wasn't considered a hate symbol for being too Germanic or whatever, the corpse-worshipers would surely be trying to appropriate it as another prophetic anticipation of the coming of their false religion to the free world. It even also symbolizes a god who selflessly gave his body in a bloody sacrifice, but he only lost a hand, and he was actually a god too. This is niether a solar symbol, nor a symbol of eternal life, but if you like the idea of confidence and holy righteousness repelling a vampire, then you can't go wrong with a symbol of heroic glory like the Tyr rune.