Search results for "e0785e38ccb3ee20fd99efcf6e3f28bc" in md5 (2)

/pol/ - Hmm I wonder why she would say that
Anonymous United States No.513820078
>For all the blog posts, it all just comes down to adhom and fallacies
>is fine with all the above provided whoever is doing it, even in far greater and more frenzied amounts, agrees with him
You really are a shameless shill. Tell me more about what "Republicans said". Oh no wait, you're going to keep saying
>I said bipartisan so shut up about my words from earlier because I want you to forget and ignore them
Not gonna, nigger. Your jewish pilpul doesn't work on someone who isn't a shill like you. You're here to shill against Republicans and your sudden invocation of "bipartisan" doesn't change that obvious fact. That's why you're continuing to dodge and deflect. And I'm not defending Republicans. Haven't once, never will. But your agenda is clear, and I'm not letting you cover up what you already revealed. You suck at your job.
/pol/ - Thread 512139156
Anonymous United States No.512147740
>No retard
It's mad, lol