Anon has solid reasoning to the OP’s question in last thread. I will re-hash this and a few others.
>>512922691
And now finally answering your question rather than being tautological, my best guess of what is the most common and general involvement of the politicians in crime is probably being financed or benefitted by the criminal agents to a great extent. Ask yourself, what is the most effective lobbying groups in the history of the USA (hint: AIPAC, successor to the ECs)? How many people in congress do they benefit? Would attempting to witness against 'the pedophiles' lead to this group and its patronized politicians drop the support for the accusation witness? Would something even worse happen, like the main Epstein witness who was recently suicided?
I genuinely believe that those complicit in the mass child diddling in the US elite do so in part for fear of death (as there have been murders), in part for fear of political isolation (we are dealing with very pathetic and weak people in the US congress).
Or maybe I'm just a not very smart anon. But it is clear that it is not safe to go after pedophiles in the USA, especially when many of them have double citizenship (see Roman Polanski) and can escape from their crimes and still influence their industry to blacklist you. In the case of politics and the murder of Virginia Giuffre, it means you can actually be murdered for trying to expose the child diddlers.
TLDR the answer is that they fear being suicided.
