>>513550288
A woman would NEVER imply that literally everyone is into some other woman, especially one with tiddies like that.
So yes, OP image alone 100% indicates glownigger fuckery.
As the thread is finishing up and everyone is leaving >anyone think the sign tapping was a major contributor for this? >as in, they thought Trump won and they really could rally White men with a piss poor and wildly limited woke rollback?
I bet that fucking hurt.
>>509745566 >pls have a baby so we can threaten you into a war more effectively >be under the influence of women so we can run propoganda that le scary iranians are coming to take our feminism
