>>107106958
>you should read the wiki pages on synthesizers and audio equipment. many of them are so poorly written, wrong and make up fantasy terms for things that don't exist, they were written by idiots reading advertising material, magazines and making shit up.
The articles on subjects I'm familiar with are also mostly super bad. And I don't even mean that they get complicated details wrong. There's stuff like wrongly atributed quotes for example because the wiki author confused the editor of an edited volume with the author of the actual chapter.

It seems a lot of wikipedia is just cobbled together haphazardly. But we only realize it in the topics we're personally familiar with when it's probably a systemic issue.