>>4470018
Woah, trvth nook.
The hyllics on /p/ will not let this crime of a statement go unabaited. OVF is clearly at least 70% more sovl and better for anything because who would use an electronic screen to view the world? That's obviously just as bad as sitting at home with google street view you mindless sheeple buying new hardware.
My personal estimate is no fewer than four anons will now tell you how EVFs are inferior and how you've basically killed photography by letting this spooky demon into the market share.
4chan Search
2 results for "e166d58f17f59f2ee04dece452c22fea"
>>4432017
>I'm not a homo because I read the /pol/ sticky to sound smart
>continues to white knight the company regardless of the point being made
I called you out on your bullshit pseud statement, idgaf about your favourite brand of camera. It's retardation like this I wish /p/ was free of. Dropkicks like you spout bullshit as fact, and the very few newcomers we get here are suckered in to this magical idea that somehow gathering more light is bad for a piece of equipment where its entire job is gathering light.
Crop is fine. I shoot crop. It works for a lot of people as a balance between price:performance. But you, good sir, are a delusional faggot.
>I'm not a homo because I read the /pol/ sticky to sound smart
>continues to white knight the company regardless of the point being made
I called you out on your bullshit pseud statement, idgaf about your favourite brand of camera. It's retardation like this I wish /p/ was free of. Dropkicks like you spout bullshit as fact, and the very few newcomers we get here are suckered in to this magical idea that somehow gathering more light is bad for a piece of equipment where its entire job is gathering light.
Crop is fine. I shoot crop. It works for a lot of people as a balance between price:performance. But you, good sir, are a delusional faggot.