>>24698856
Marx does not propose historical determinism. This is a common fallacy that beginners to Marxism make. He's obviously in the middle with regards to the axis that on one end is the utopian socialism he argued against, where everything is simply a design of our minds and we can simply conjure up the perfect political project, and on the other end crude determinism that is closer to physics than history.
What you are critiquing more closely resembles that of Right-Hegelianism, which, to simplify (and, if I recall correctly, the Young Hegelians themselves championed this interpretation), believed that Hegel advocated for the status quo.