>>4468774
>>4468842
what about the pic sucks/looks like m43?
>>4468770
i rock an xt3 to complement my xpro2 when i want to use a larger lens, a tripod, or want to do critical focus manually. it's solid as an all-rounder body and i think it can make for a smaller setup than the zf. personally i loved the xpro3 in practice but they seem to have a propensity for glitches and hardware failure so i stuck with the 2. but yeah if you aren't planning to focus on quick street, travel, or close people pics, then you likely won't see much of the strengths of the xpros.
speaking of skill, i personally think the crop system requires more skill to get a nice picture. there will be lighting that the ff excels in which will look drab on apsc. the weaker your sensor, the more attentive you need to be to the quality of your light to get anything that looks good. in a way, having the more beautiful sensor, and even glass too i suppose, teaches you less discipline and shot selection because you can point your camera anywhere and the quality of the system will simply make anything look great.
honestly, if you are interested in adapting, zf is the clear winner. compare sample images, consider use case, consider cost and the mount system as a whole. but time wasted theorizing and researching is time you could have spent simply shooting and learning firsthand so i recommend just getting what looks good and going from there.