>>40948503
a bayesian statistics machine is not going to magically become sentient retard. to even create a facsimile of what you're suggesting would take an entirely new compression algorithm, a global super uplift of internet access and speed, a new storage medium with dumb impossible write and read speeds plus stability for holding context, and a perfect tensor core that NVIDIA or whatever company that invents it would just produce out of the kindness of their cold black and wrinkled corporate hearts (in other words, impossible)
and you have to power it. i'm sure some government out there will magically start building ten fusion reactors all at once and have them all done before the decade is out.
even then, say you do it all, i bet i chat with this thing for 5 minutes and find an error, and see that it has, grand total after your shitty training, like 20 different narrative ideas, 30 different structures of response and a demented set of guardrails.
what's really funny is it is acult, this 'AI is god' stuff. it's just like a cult. eventually you will all collectively realize that the entire thing was bullshit, that stochastic models are just some dead end tech only good for entertaining indians, and that any sort of super artificial intelligence is basically unattainable because you're trying to attain non-deterministic answers from a machine expressly incapable of producing anything else. you'll realize that, and this whole thing will fizzle out with quiet embarrassment as you all pack up to never talk about it again and avoid it forever out of shame for being such deluded morons. none of you are any wiser than people who donate to televangelists, you are exactly like your parents.
go find your faith in Christ, and get humbled.