>>281733961
It is made even weirder by the fact that they didn't remove the loli nudity when adapting Ishuzoku Reviewers
>>281734007
Yeah, the manga dropped it, the Ishuzoku Reviewers manga has plenty of nudity still including lolis, but no lolipires sadly

>>281314517
If Passione pussies out and doesn't show any of the lolis' nipples like the VN does then it would be the very first full year without loli nipples in anime history so they better deliver, they previously did show loli nipples without problem years ago and besides these girls are older than they look so you can always use that excuse (yeah, I know that didn't stop Australia from banning flat chested pornstars despite them being adults)

>>280902734
>Loli nipples when?
Ishuzoku Reviewers got away with them because they said "she's actually an adult who just looks like a little girl", I don't think this one would be able to do so, MahoAko had 13 and 14 years old character's nipples, but that was another studio