>>724160359
>And then you proceeded to talk in circles to try to avoid admitting that you're running DLSS, which everyone knows looks like absolute shit in motion
It realy doesn't anymore, that's outdated news. DLSS4 degrades in motion significantly less than the vendor-agnostic render methods.

>>718770951
>I SURE LOVE EVERYTHING LOOKING BLURRY IN MOTION!
I don't play with TAA (the standard rendering mode of every 3d game nowadays) so I don't have the problem of everything looking blurry in motion.